Bohack v. Keller Industries, Inc.
804 So. 2d 335, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9158, 2001 WL 747259
Opinion
We reverse the order granting Keller Industries’ motion for summary final judgment. The record reveals that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved in this case regarding, inter alia, whether Keller had affixed a duty rating label to its ladder prior to distribution. See Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Roy, 498 So.2d 859 (Fla.1986); Giddens v. Denman Rubber Mfg. Co., 440 So.2d 1320 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). These questions of fact are more properly resolved by a jury. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla.1985).
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bohack v. Keller Industries, Inc., 804 So. 2d 335, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9158, 2001 WL 747259 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
804 So. 2d 335 (Bohack v. Keller Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
American Cyanamid Co. v. Roy
498 So. 2d 859 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Moore v. Morris
475 So. 2d 666 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Giddens v. Denman Rubber Mfg. Co.
440 So. 2d 1320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)