Bogutski v. Board of Education

167 A.D.2d 987, 562 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14346

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The negligence action brought for injuries received by plaintiff Angelina Bogutski during the course of her employment by the Board of Education of the City of New York is barred by Workers’ Compensation Law §§ 11, 29 (6). The individual defendant, a custodian-engineer appointed by the Board of Education pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Service Law (see, Education Law § 2503 [5]; § 2509 [4]), is also an employee of the Board of Education (see, Beck v Board of Educ., 268 App Div 644, 648-649, affd 295 NY 717). Thus, plaintiff is barred by Workers’ Compensation Law §29 (6) from maintaining this action for negligence against the individual defendant, her coemployee. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Kings County, Hutcherson, J.—summary judgment.) Present— Boomer, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bogutski v. Board of Education, 167 A.D.2d 987, 562 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

167 A.D.2d 987 (Bogutski v. Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beck v. Board of Education of the City of New York
65 N.E.2d 426 (New York Court of Appeals, 1946)
Beck v. Board of Education
268 A.D. 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)