Bogue-Badenoch Co. v. Boyden

33 Ill. App. 252, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 363
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided June 14, 1889·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Gary, J.

This is a suit upon a replevin hond by the late coroner of Cook county, for the use of the judgment creditors upon whose execution the property was in the hands of the sheriff, at the time it was replevied by the appellants. The merits were not tried in the replevin suit, and were, therefore, open to inquiry in this. The record has been examined by the court and there is no error in it.

It is unnecessary to go through the various objections made by appellants’ brief. "Mo errors are assigned upon the record or attached thereto in accordance with rule 15. A loose paper, unsigned, unentitled either as to case or court, with no file mark upon it, is found among the printed matter which came to the hands of one of the judges when the case was being examined in conference, which says some judgment is wrong, but it is mere conjecture that it has anything to do with this case. The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bogue-Badenoch Co. v. Boyden, 33 Ill. App. 252, 1889 Ill. App. LEXIS 363 (Ill. Ct. App. 1889).

33 Ill. App. 252 (Bogue-Badenoch Co. v. Boyden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawthorne v. Cartier Lumber Co.
121 Ill. App. 494 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)
Brown v. H. W. Boies Co.
58 Ill. App. 274 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1895)