Bogle v. Sullivant
5 Va. 487, 1 Call 561, 1799 Va. LEXIS 20
Opinion
Delivered .the resolution of the Court to the following effect:
The Court sees no difference between this and other cases, where the evidence is admitted, and the weight which it ought to have is left to the jury, who have a right to decide it.
[* Ross v. Gill et ux. 1 Wash. 90; Keel et al. v. Herbert, 1 Wash. 203; Blincoe v. Berkeley, l Call, 412;Whitacre v. McIlhaney, 4 Munf, 313.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bogle v. Sullivant, 5 Va. 487, 1 Call 561, 1799 Va. LEXIS 20 (Va. Ct. App. 1799).
5 Va. 487 (Bogle v. Sullivant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Womack v. Circle
29 Va. 192 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1877)
Cropper v. Commonwealth
2 Va. 842 (General Court of Virginia, 1843)
Lloyd v. Scott
15 F. Cas. 720 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia, 1832)
Dabney v. Taliaferro
4 Rand. 256 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1826)
Brooke v. Young
3 Va. 106 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1824)
Lee v. Tapscott
2 Va. 276 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1796)