Bogle v. City of New York

86 N.E.2d 179, 299 N.Y. 620, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1077
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 20, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 N.E.2d 179 (Bogle v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bogle v. City of New York, 86 N.E.2d 179, 299 N.Y. 620, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1077 (N.Y. 1949).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We cannot say, as a matter of law, on this record that there is no room for the exercise of discretion. The Appellate .Division having reversed the order of the Special Term and denied the motion upon questions of law, we accordingly reverse the order appealed from and remit the matter to that court for compliance with section 602 of the Civil Practice Act.

*621 The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted to that court for compliance with section 602 of the Civil Practice Act, without costs.

Loughban, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fund and Bromley, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF BIBERIAS v. New York City Transit Auth.
265 N.E.2d 775 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Pandoliano v. New York City Transit Authority
17 A.D.2d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.E.2d 179, 299 N.Y. 620, 1949 N.Y. LEXIS 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogle-v-city-of-new-york-ny-1949.