Boggs v. Taylor

29 Ohio St. 172
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 Ohio St. 172 (Boggs v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boggs v. Taylor, 29 Ohio St. 172 (Ohio 1876).

Opinion

By the Court.

The account of the administrator should he settled in accordance with the following principles:

1. The interest or income which accrued from these, funds during the lifetime of Jane Taylor, subject to the charges below specified, belongs absolutely to her estate. See Davis v. Boggs, 20 Ohio St. 550.

2. The income should be charged with the payment of all taxes on account of the principal during her lifetime.

3. The income should also be charged with the costs and [174]*174expenses incurred on account thereof, and all other administrative expenses should be paid out of the residuum.

4. Commissions due to the administrator should be charged against the principal and the income, in proportion to their respective amounts.

Judgments of the district and common pleas courts reversed, and cause remanded to the common pleas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rothschild v. Weinthel
131 N.E. 917 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Ohio St. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boggs-v-taylor-ohio-1876.