Boggs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boggs v. State

166 So. 3d 899, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8613, 2015 WL 3522284

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 2015

Docket2D14-5321

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 So. 3d 899 (Boggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boggs v. State, 166 So. 3d 899, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8613, 2015 WL 3522284 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

LeVaughn A. Boggs appeals the post-conviction court’s order denying his motion *900 to' correct jail credit Sled under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. However, Boggs was released from prison on November 8, 2014. Because Boggs has been released from prison, having completed his prison sentence, the jail credit issue is moot. See Toomer v. State, 895 So.2d 1256, 1256-57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); cf. Mills v. State, 6 So.3d 77, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (affirming the dismissal of a postcon-viction motion seeking additional jail credit when the sentence was fully served and the additional credit would not affect a subsequent sentence). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Dismissed.

• WALLACE, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

LeVaughn A. Boggs appeals the post-conviction court’s order denying his motion *900 to' correct jail credit Sled under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. However, Boggs was released from prison on November 8, 2014. Because Boggs has been released from prison, having completed his prison sentence, the jail credit issue is moot. See Toomer v. State, 895 So.2d 1256, 1256-57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); cf. Mills v. State, 6 So.3d 77, 78 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (affirming the dismissal of a postcon-viction motion seeking additional jail credit when the sentence was fully served and the additional credit would not affect a subsequent sentence). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Dismissed.

• WALLACE, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 3d 899, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8613, 2015 WL 3522284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boggs-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack