Boggs v. North Carolina Attorney General

3 F. App'x 118
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2001·No. 00-7352·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry Wayne Boggs appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Boggs v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-99-379-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2000); Vick v. Williams, 233 F.3d 213 (4th Cir.2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boggs v. North Carolina Attorney General, 3 F. App'x 118 (4th Cir. 2001).

3 F. App'x 118 (Boggs v. North Carolina Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vick v. Williams
233 F.3d 213 (Fourth Circuit, 2000)