Boggs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

341 So. 2d 1071
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 1977
DocketNo. AA-140
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 341 So. 2d 1071 (Boggs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boggs v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 341 So. 2d 1071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A reading of the order granting a new trial from whence this appeal emanates reveals that one of the alternative bases recited by the trial court for granting a new trial was that the verdict was contrary to the evidence as it related to percentages of negligence. Appellant has made no attempt in her briefs to demonstrate that the court’s said stated alternative ground was legally or factually erroneous. It is axiomatic that when an order of the trial court purports to be based upon several alternative grounds it will not be disturbed on appeal if one of the grounds is sufficient for the action taken even though another recited alternative ground is erroneous. Accordingly, the order here appealed is

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 So. 2d 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boggs-v-aetna-casualty-surety-co-fladistctapp-1977.