Boggs Avenue

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Boggs Avenue

152 Pa. 135

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 122·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Williams,

This case is ruled by Travers’s Appeal, decided at the present term. The sixth exception to the report should have been sustained by the court below and the report set aside or recommitted, that an assessment of costs and expenses might be made upon the basis pointed out in Bingaman v. The city of Pittsburgh, 29 W. N. 364, 147 Pa. 353.

The decree is set aside at the costs of the appellee and a procedendo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Williams,

This case is ruled by Travers’s Appeal, decided at the present term. The sixth exception to the report should have been sustained by the court below and the report set aside or recommitted, that an assessment of costs and expenses might be made upon the basis pointed out in Bingaman v. The city of Pittsburgh, 29 W. N. 364, 147 Pa. 353.

The decree is set aside at the costs of the appellee and a procedendo awarded.

Boggs Avenue, 152 Pa. 135 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

152 Pa. 135 (Boggs Avenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related