Boggan v. State

170 So. 282, 176 Miss. 655, 1936 Miss. LEXIS 166
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 2, 1936
DocketNo. 32293.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 170 So. 282 (Boggan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boggan v. State, 170 So. 282, 176 Miss. 655, 1936 Miss. LEXIS 166 (Mich. 1936).

Opinion

*658 Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from the conviction of robbery, the defense being an alibi. The evidence for the state, which the jury believed, justifies the verdict as to all the appellants; consequently the appellant’s request for a directed verdict of not guilty was correctly denied. The indictment alleged that the robbery was committed by means of an assault with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a pistol. The evidence for the state as to the use of the weapon was in conflict.

. The court below, in an instruction for the state, permitted the jury to “find the defendants guilty of rob *659 bery without firearms,” and a verdict was returned accordingly.

The statutes pertinent are as follows:

Section 1126, Code 1930. — “Every person who shall feloniously take the personal property of another, in his presence or from his person and against his will, by violence to his person or by putting such person in fear of some immediate injury to his person, shall be guilty of robbery.”

Section 1128, Code 1930. — “Every person convicted of robbery shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not more than fifteen years.”

Section 1, chapter 328, Laws 1932. — “That every person who shall feloniously take or attempt to take from the person or from the presence the personal property of another and against his will by violence to his person or by putting such person in fear of immediate injury to his person by the exhibition of a deadly weapon shall be guilty of robbery and, upon conviction, shall be punished by death if the penalty is so fixed by the jury; and in cases where the jury fails to fix the penalty at death, the court shall fix the penalty at imprisonment in the penitentiary for any term not less than three years.”

The last of these statutes does not repeal the two former, but simply provides for a greater punishment than does section 1128 for the commission of a crime by the use of a deadly weapon. An indictment under chapter 328, Laws 1932, includes all the elements of the crime defined by section 1126 of the Code. Section 1280, Code 1930, provides that “On an indictment for any offense the jury may find the defendant guilty of the offense as charged, or of any attempt to commit the same offense, or may find him guilty of an inferior offense, or other offense, the commission of which is necessarily included in the offense with which he is charged in the indictment, whether the same be a felony or misdemeanor, without *660 any additional count in the indictment for that purpose. ’ ’ This statute controls here; and the court committed no error by ruling in accordance therewith.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hye v. State
162 So. 3d 750 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2015)
State v. Shaw
880 So. 2d 296 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2004)
State of Mississippi v. Tommy Dean Shaw
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2001
Hailey v. State
537 So. 2d 411 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1988)
Sanders v. State
479 So. 2d 1097 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1985)
Auman v. State
271 So. 2d 427 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1973)
Brown v. State
240 So. 2d 615 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1970)
State v. Thornhill
171 So. 2d 308 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Scott v. State
56 So. 2d 839 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Fortenberry v. State
1 So. 2d 585 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 So. 282, 176 Miss. 655, 1936 Miss. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boggan-v-state-miss-1936.