Bogg v. Geezil
This text of 83 So. 2d 20 (Bogg v. Geezil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 30 F.S.A., Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 So. 2d 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogg-v-geezil-fla-1955.