Bogert v. Vermilya
1 Seld. Notes 66
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bogert v. Vermilya. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.Y. 447 →
Opinion
The statute of limitations does not run against one of two makers of a joint and several promissory note while he is residing in a foreign country, though the other maker remain a resident, and the right of action becomes in the meantime barred as against him.
An immaterial issue, however it may be found, where the rights of the parties are established by the finding upon material issues, has no effect upon the judgment.
(See 10 Barb. 32; 10 N. Y. 447, S. C.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bogert v. Vermilya, 1 Seld. Notes 66 (N.Y. 1853).
1 Seld. Notes 66 (Bogert v. Vermilya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bogert v. . Vermilya
10 N.Y. 447 (New York Court of Appeals, 1853)
Bogert v. Vermilya
10 Barb. 32 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)