Bogert v. Riordan

230 A.D. 866

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. As the plaintiff has not demanded any deficiency judgment against the defendants, a counterclaim based upon plaintiff’s breach of a covenant contained in his deed may not be interposed in this action to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage. (National Fire Ins. Co. v. Mc Kay, 21 N. Y. 191; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Snyder, 52 App. Div. 606; affd., 170 N. Y. 565; Lipman v. J. A. I. Works, 128 id. 58.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompldns, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bogert v. Riordan, 230 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

230 A.D. 866 (Bogert v. Riordan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merchants' National Bank of Albany v. . Snyder
62 N.E. 1006 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
National Fire Insurance Company v. . McKay
21 N.Y. 191 (New York Court of Appeals, 1860)
Merchants' National Bank v. Snyder
52 A.D. 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)