Bogert v. Riordan
This text of 230 A.D. 866 (Bogert v. Riordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. As the plaintiff has not demanded any deficiency judgment against the defendants, a counterclaim based upon plaintiff’s breach of a covenant contained in his deed may not be interposed in this action to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage. (National Fire Ins. Co. v. Mc Kay, 21 N. Y. 191; Merchants’ Nat. Bank v. Snyder, 52 App. Div. 606; affd., 170 N. Y. 565; Lipman v. J. A. I. Works, 128 id. 58.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Tompldns, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogert-v-riordan-nyappdiv-1930.