Bogert v. Bancroft
3 Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 466
This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 127 (Bogert v. Bancroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bogert v. Bancroft, 3 Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 466 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).
Opinion
Under the circumstances of this case, we think the signature sufficient. But we do not by this mean to say, that subjoining the name of a counsel in the cause, is, in these incidental proceedings, adequate to that of the attorney. We rather think it is not.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Cai. Cas. 127, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogert-v-bancroft-nysupct-1805.