Boger v. Curlee Masonry, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedNovember 19, 2001
DocketI.C. NO. 969629
StatusPublished

This text of Boger v. Curlee Masonry, Inc. (Boger v. Curlee Masonry, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boger v. Curlee Masonry, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2001).

Opinion

The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Holmes and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence in this matter. Having reconsidered the evidence, the Full Commission reverses the Deputy Commissioner's denial of benefits and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. At all relevant times, the parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employer-employee relationship existed between the defendant-employer and plaintiff from June 7, 1999 through August 1999.

3. Defendant-employer is insured by Valley Forge Insurance Company for the claim brought by plaintiff in this action.

4. The date of plaintiff's alleged injury is August 2, 1999.

5. Plaintiff's medical records, as exchanged between the parties, as well as plaintiff's physical therapy records, may be received into evidence without further authentication or proof.

6. Valley Forge Insurance Company, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. §97-18(d), has paid plaintiff $2,666.80 in temporary total disability compensation and had paid $856.50 in medical compensation for a total of $3,523.30 in compensation.

***********
Based on the competent evidence of record and the reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On August 6, 1999 defendant-employer Curlee Masonry, Inc. completed Form 19 Employer Report of Injury in which it reported that on August 2, 1999 at about 9:30 a.m. its employee, laborer Waldon Boger, had injured his "upper back" as he "was climbing scaffolding-something caught in back and was not able to work." Curlee reported that Mr. Boger reported his injury "immediately" to his supervisor Jeffrey Bumgardner. Curlee also reported that plaintiff started working for Curlee on June 7, 1999 at an hourly wage of $10.00, 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, for an average weekly wage of $400.00.

2. On August 27, 1999 Fay Lewis of Curlee's insurance carrier took a recorded telephone statement from Waldon Boger concerning his employment and how the accident occurred.

3. On September 28, 1999 CNA completed a Form 63 in which defendants accepted plaintiff's August 2, 1999 neck injury claim without prejudice to later deny his claim as permitted by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-18(d). On September 28, 1999 defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $266.68 per week in disability benefits, with the first payment to be made on September 16, 1999.

4. On October 27, 1999 plaintiff, now represented by counsel, submitted Form 18 to the Commission, alleging an August 2, 1999 neck injury "caused by my lifting and moving heavy load of bricks over scaffold brace." Plaintiff also alleged he may have suffered a ruptured cervical disc for which he may need surgery.

5. On November 1, 1999 the Commission received plaintiff's Form 33 hearing request because defendants denied his claim. He sought disability benefits and medical compensation.

6. On November 4, 1999 CNA claim specialist Fay Lewis completed Form 61 denial of claim and provided the following "detailed statement of its grounds for denying compensability of the claim" as required by G.S. § 97-18(d) (E42):

"Employee did not sustain an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment.

Alleged injury did not occur at work.

The incident described by the employee is not the proximate cause of the alleged injury.

Any other facts that may become available at a later date."

7. On June 27, 2000 plaintiff filed a motion under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-25 seeking Commission approval of Winston-Salem neurosurgeon William O. Bell to assume plaintiff s care for his neck injury. Plaintiff's initial treating physician, Dr. Joseph P. Zuhosky of the Miller Clinic in Charlotte testified, and the Full Commission finds as fact, that it was appropriate for plaintiff to seek other treatment because he had moved to the Winston-Salem area and Charlotte was too far away for regular treatment.

8. On December 20, 1989, while at work for Dixie Furniture in Lexington, N.C., plaintiff fell off a ladder and injured his lower back. He received total disability compensation benefits for about 4 months and was awarded additional compensation for a 5 percent permanent loss to his back under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-31(23). This was in IC No. 005013.

9. On January 8, 1999, while at work for 4c's Food Service in Charlotte. N.C., plaintiff slipped on a wet floor and fell, injuring his lower back. He was paid total disability compensation benefits beginning January 8, 1999. An April 1999 lumbar MRI did not reveal any significant lumbar abnormalities. On May 4, 1999 plaintiff told Dr. Dyer that on April 26, 1999 he fell in the shower and his back pain is hurting worse since then. On May 25, 1999 neurosurgeon Dyer examined plaintiff and found him to be doing better and not having as much back pain with better flexibility and rotation. Dr. Dyer then released him to "return to work on Monday, May 31, 1999 without restriction." Plaintiff's benefits ended on May 31, 1999.

10. On June 7, 1999 plaintiff was hired by Curlee Masonry as a laborer. Jeff Bumgardner, Curlee Masonry's job superintendent and working foreman hired plaintiff to work as a laborer at Crown Ridge Apartments in Charlotte, N.C. On this job there were bricklayers or brick masons, laborers, and a forklift driver. A laborer's job is "just supplying [brick masons] with brick, mortar, and anything that we needed for the brick masons."

11. The project involved building a brick exterior two stories high using a scaffold to get to the second floor of the apartments. On the scaffold were crossties or cross bars located between the inside and outside of the scaffold. The brick mason worked on the inside part of the scaffold next to the building, and the laborer worked on the outside part of the scaffold with the crossties between them.

12. Plaintiff described the injury as follows:

"That day was like any other day. I stayed about three to four blocks from the job and I walked to work. I get in about six thirty and I made the mud. And I made sure everything was ready when Jeff and the other brick masons came in. And I was helping — I remember I was — I was helping Keith, also, on his scaffold. Like I said, it was — there wasn't but about three big brick masons there and about three laborers. And I was helping Keith and I was going back and forth from the scaffolding. And I had both the scaffolding pretty much stocked up and I remember I — I walked — I climbed down from Keith's scaffold and went over to Jeff's scaffolding because the forklift driver was getting ready to put a band of bricks up. And I got up to Jeff's scaffold and I broke the band of bricks. Once they put the — the brick up on the scaffolding, you have to make sure that they don't fall so you have to sturdy the bricks. And I cut the band off the bricks.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-18
North Carolina § 97-18(d)
§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(6)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-31
North Carolina § 97-31(23)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Boger v. Curlee Masonry, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boger-v-curlee-masonry-inc-ncworkcompcom-2001.