Boger v. Boger
This text of 225 A.D.2d 646 (Boger v. Boger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the defendant husband’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding counsel fees to the plaintiff wife (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879; Brennen v Brennen, 148 AD2d 487; Cotton v Cotton, 147 AD2d 436; Stern v Stern, 67 AD2d 253). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann, Florio and Mc-Ginity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 A.D.2d 646, 639 N.Y.2d 936, 639 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boger-v-boger-nyappdiv-1996.