Bogen v. Florio
This text of 356 So. 2d 1277 (Bogen v. Florio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed each of the points raised by appellants in their briefs in [1278]*1278these consolidated appeals (no oral argument was requested). This review was made in the light of the applicable law as to each contention. The results of this review have led us to the conclusion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore, because appellants have failed to clearly show any such error, the actions of the trial court appealed are affirmed. See, e. g., Egidi Industrial Park Corp. v. Wide Open Spaces, Inc., 335 So.2d 870 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Castellanos v. Hialeah-Miami Springs First State Bank, 330 So.2d 100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Strata v. Strate, 328 So.2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); and Fernandez v. Arocha, 308 So.2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). See generally 2 Fla. Jur. Appeals §§ 314 and 316 (Cum.Supp. 1978).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 So. 2d 1277, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogen-v-florio-fladistctapp-1978.