Bogdanovic v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bogdanovic v. City of New York

70 A.D.3d 519, 893 N.Y.S.2d 867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 519 (Bogdanovic v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bogdanovic v. City of New York, 70 A.D.3d 519, 893 N.Y.S.2d 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered November 10, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, as limited by the briefs, awarded plaintiff $250,000 for future lost earnings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We see no reason to reduce the damages awarded to plaintiff for future earnings for a period of 20 years, where the medical evidence established that plaintiff would only be able to work part-time as a result of his injuries, and where the damages awarded by the jury were less than half the sum projected in uncontradicted testimony by plaintiffs economist (cf. Flores v Parkchester Preserv. Co., L.P., 42 AD3d 318 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 714 [2008]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered November 10, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, as limited by the briefs, awarded plaintiff $250,000 for future lost earnings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We see no reason to reduce the damages awarded to plaintiff for future earnings for a period of 20 years, where the medical evidence established that plaintiff would only be able to work part-time as a result of his injuries, and where the damages awarded by the jury were less than half the sum projected in uncontradicted testimony by plaintiffs economist (cf. Flores v Parkchester Preserv. Co., L.P., 42 AD3d 318 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 714 [2008]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.3d 519, 893 N.Y.S.2d 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogdanovic-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack