Bogart v. Bogart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bogart v. Bogart

13 A.D.2d 826, 217 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 826 (Bogart v. Bogart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bogart v. Bogart, 13 A.D.2d 826, 217 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for a stay of execution of warrant of arrest, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 2,1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before September 1, 1961. Motion by appellant to direct the court stenographer of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York to furnish him with a transcript of minutes, denied without prejudice to such an application in said court or at a Special Term of the Supreme Court, as appellant may be advised. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for a stay of execution of warrant of arrest, pending appeal, granted, on condition that appellant perfect the appeal and be ready to argue or submit it at the October Term, beginning October 2,1961; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellant’s brief must be served and filed on or before September 1, 1961. Motion by appellant to direct the court stenographer of the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York to furnish him with a transcript of minutes, denied without prejudice to such an application in said court or at a Special Term of the Supreme Court, as appellant may be advised. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 826, 217 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogart-v-bogart-nyappdiv-1961.