Bogard v. State

807 S.W.2d 468, 305 Ark. 391, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 231
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bogard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 311 Ark. 412
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided April 29, 1991·No. RC 91-20·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Robert Bogard and George Willis, by their attorney, have filed for a rule on the clerk.

Their attorney, Clyde E. Lee, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause-to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bogard v. State, 807 S.W.2d 468, 305 Ark. 391, 1991 Ark. LEXIS 231 (Ark. 1991).

807 S.W.2d 468 (Bogard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.