Bogan v. Sprott
16 S.E. 35, 37 S.C. 605
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 4, 1892
DocketNo. 3016
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 16 S.E. 35 (Bogan v. Sprott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bogan v. Sprott, 16 S.E. 35, 37 S.C. 605 (S.C. 1892).
Opinion
Opinion by
[605]*605These were two separate • actions to recover amounts due on open accounts for labor performed. Judgment was separately rendered by the trial justice in favor of the two plaintiffs, and, on appeal to the Circuit Court, where the two cases were again heard together, judgment was ordered severally to each plaintiff, with costs to each. Defendant appealed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kennedy v. Emp. St. Und'rs of Watertown, N.Y.
24 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1943)
Ford v. New York Life Insurance Co.
185 S.E. 914 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 S.E. 35, 37 S.C. 605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogan-v-sprott-sc-1892.