Bogan v. Sprott
16 S.E. 35, 37 S.C. 605
Opinion
Opinion by
[605] These were two separate • actions to recover amounts due on open accounts for labor performed. Judgment was separately rendered by the trial justice in favor of the two plaintiffs, and, on appeal to the Circuit Court, where the two cases were again heard together, judgment was ordered severally to each plaintiff, with costs to each. Defendant appealed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bogan v. Sprott, 16 S.E. 35, 37 S.C. 605 (S.C. 1892).
16 S.E. 35 (Bogan v. Sprott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kennedy v. Emp. St. Und'rs of Watertown, N.Y.
24 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1943)
Ford v. New York Life Insurance Co.
185 S.E. 914 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1936)