Bogan v. Hall

2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 30, 2009
Docket2008-2331
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2009 Ohio 1930 (Bogan v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bogan v. Hall, 2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, James C. Bogan, for a writ of habeas corpus. Bogan failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to his petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14; R.C. 2725.04(D).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Ingram Jr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogan-v-hall-ohio-2009.