Bogan v. Hall
2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608
This text of 2009 Ohio 1930 (Bogan v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bogan v. Hall, 2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608 (Ohio 2009).
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, James C. Bogan, for a writ of habeas corpus. Bogan failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to his petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14; R.C. 2725.04(D).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James Ingram Jr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogan-v-hall-ohio-2009.