Bogan v. Hall

Ohio Supreme Court

Bogan v. Hall

2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 30, 2009·No. 2008-2331·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, James C. Bogan, for a writ of habeas corpus. Bogan failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to his petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14; R.C. 2725.04(D).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the petition of appellant, James C. Bogan, for a writ of habeas corpus. Bogan failed to attach copies of his commitment papers to his petition. Goudlock v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 398, 2008-Ohio-4787, 894 N.E.2d 692, ¶ 14; R.C. 2725.04(D).

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Bogan v. Hall, 2009 Ohio 1930, 906 N.E.2d 1112, 121 Ohio St. 3d 608 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

2009 Ohio 1930 (Bogan v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related