Bogan v. Everitt

66 S.W.2d 413
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 7, 1933
DocketNo. 2494.
StatusPublished

This text of 66 S.W.2d 413 (Bogan v. Everitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bogan v. Everitt, 66 S.W.2d 413 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

O’QUINN, Justice.

This appeal was taken from a judgment of the district court of San Jacinto county, refusing to reinstate the case on the docket of said court, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution, and was filed on the docket of this court on May 5, 1933, and was by this court, on June 29, 1933, set for submission on November 23, 1933.

The case is before us without briefs by either party, and no excuse is shown why briefs have not been filed. The rule is well settled that the failure of the parties to an appeal, without good cause being shown, to file briefs, in accordance with the rules prescribed by the Supreme Court and the statute, authorizes the Court of Civil Appeals to dismiss the appeal without searching the record for fundamental error. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.(2d) 811; Ferguson v. Harris County (Tex. Civ. App.) 42 S.W.(2d) 297; Yuba Oil Co. v. Williams (Tex. Civ. App.) 50 S.W.(2d) 416.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
14 S.W.2d 811 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)
Ferguson v. Harris County
42 S.W.2d 297 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Yuba Oil Co. v. Williams
50 S.W.2d 416 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 S.W.2d 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogan-v-everitt-texapp-1933.