Bogacki v. Zalemski
This text of 238 A.D. 764 (Bogacki v. Zalemski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs. We view the action of the town board in adopting the resolution of January 1, 1932, as a wrongful discharge of the constables then in office, except Zalemski, and that the order appealed from directs their reinstatement, and we, therefore, affirm the order, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes to affirm as to the three men whose salaries under said resolution were twenty dollars per month on the ground that upon the present record we cannot say that sixty dollars a month was not a living wage. [143 Misc. 140.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bogacki-v-zalemski-nyappdiv-1933.