Boffey v. Boffey

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boffey v. Boffey

430 So. 2d 514, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28556

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 20, 1983

DocketNos. 81-492, 82-1626

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 430 So. 2d 514 (Boffey v. Boffey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boffey v. Boffey, 430 So. 2d 514, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated appeals from a non-final order and a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage matter. The non-final appeal is hereby dismissed as moot. The final judgment dissolving the marriage is affirmed as modified. The provision in the final judgment dealing with the distribution of the proceeds of the bankruptcy proceeding involving husband and wife, [515]*515along with the wife’s mother and a corporation, is deleted. The wife’s mother and the corporation were not parties to the proceeding and no ruling affecting them should have been made. As the trial court has retained jurisdiction in this matter, the proceeds eventually derived from the bankruptcy proceeding are subject to the court’s further orders after the bankruptcy proceeding is complete. The paragraph dealing with distribution of the bankruptcy assets is stricken and the judgment is affirmed as modified.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are consolidated appeals from a non-final order and a final judgment in a dissolution of marriage matter. The non-final appeal is hereby dismissed as moot. The final judgment dissolving the marriage is affirmed as modified. The provision in the final judgment dealing with the distribution of the proceeds of the bankruptcy proceeding involving husband and wife, [515]*515along with the wife’s mother and a corporation, is deleted. The wife’s mother and the corporation were not parties to the proceeding and no ruling affecting them should have been made. As the trial court has retained jurisdiction in this matter, the proceeds eventually derived from the bankruptcy proceeding are subject to the court’s further orders after the bankruptcy proceeding is complete. The paragraph dealing with distribution of the bankruptcy assets is stricken and the judgment is affirmed as modified.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

DOWNEY, BERANEK and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

430 So. 2d 514, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 28556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boffey-v-boffey-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack