Boff v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boff v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Co.

262 A.D. 968, 30 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6693

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by the infant plaintiff as the result of the defendant’s negligence while alighting from one of the defendant’s trolley cars, and by her father for loss of services and for expenses, judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs Beatrice Boff, an infant, by her guardian ad litem, Julius Boff, and Julius Boff, individually, in the sum of $538.70, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by the infant plaintiff as the result of the defendant’s negligence while alighting from one of the defendant’s trolley cars, and by her father for loss of services and for expenses, judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiffs Beatrice Boff, an infant, by her guardian ad litem, Julius Boff, and Julius Boff, individually, in the sum of $538.70, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Boff v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Co., 262 A.D. 968, 30 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 968 (Boff v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related