Boeynaems v. Ah Leong

242 U.S. 612, 37 S. Ct. 20, 61 L. Ed. 527, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1407
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 30, 1916·No. No. 28·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Lewis & Cooke v. Atcherley, 222 U. S. 285, 294; John Ii Estate v. Brown, 235 U. S. 342, 349; Kapiolani Estate v. Atcherley, 238 U. S. 119, 136; Cardona v. Quinones, 240 U. S. 83, 88. Mr. Lorrin Andrews for the plaintiff in error. Mr. David L. Withington for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boeynaems v. Ah Leong, 242 U.S. 612, 37 S. Ct. 20, 61 L. Ed. 527, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1407 (1916).

242 U.S. 612 (Boeynaems v. Ah Leong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kinney v. Oahu Sugar Co.
255 F. 732 (Ninth Circuit, 1919)