Boese v. Slaughter
This text of 316 F. App'x 676 (Boese v. Slaughter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Montana state prisoner Douglas R. Boese appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Boese failed to create a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. See id. at 1054, 1057-58.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Boese’s motion to compel discovery because he did not demonstrate that additional discovery would have precluded summary judgment. See Corn-well v. Electro, Cent. Credit Union, 439 F.3d 1018, 1026 (9th Cir.2006).
Boese’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F. App'x 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boese-v-slaughter-ca9-2009.