Boernstein v. Heinrichs

Supreme Court of Missouri

Boernstein v. Heinrichs

24 Mo. 27

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1856

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 Mo. 27 (Boernstein v. Heinrichs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boernstein v. Heinrichs, 24 Mo. 27 (Mo. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Leonard, Judge.

The case seems to have been set for'trial by consent on a particular day in tbe return term, and was on that day postponed by like consent to a subsequent day in the same term. And the defendant, after a trial in his absence at the time agreed upon, can not withdraw his consent by subsequently insisting that the cause was not triable of right at that term. He has concluded himself by his own act, even if he were in time with his motion. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leonard, Judge.

The case seems to have been set for'trial by consent on a particular day in tbe return term, and was on that day postponed by like consent to a subsequent day in the same term. And the defendant, after a trial in his absence at the time agreed upon, can not withdraw his consent by subsequently insisting that the cause was not triable of right at that term. He has concluded himself by his own act, even if he were in time with his motion. The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 Mo. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boernstein-v-heinrichs-mo-1856.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack