Boerema v. Frazier

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boerema v. Frazier

471 So. 2d 647, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1601, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2020

StatusPublished

This text of 471 So. 2d 647 (Boerema v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boerema v. Frazier, 471 So. 2d 647, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1601, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment entered below upon a holding that there was sufficient evidence for the trial court to conclude that the condition precedent giving rise to liability on a promissory note had not been fulfilled.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to the plaintiff/appellant to satisfy the condition precedent and thereafter file a new action should the defendant/appellee fail to satisfy the terms of the obligation.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment entered below upon a holding that there was sufficient evidence for the trial court to conclude that the condition precedent giving rise to liability on a promissory note had not been fulfilled.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to the plaintiff/appellant to satisfy the condition precedent and thereafter file a new action should the defendant/appellee fail to satisfy the terms of the obligation.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

471 So. 2d 647, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1601, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boerema-v-frazier-fladistctapp-1985.