Boenhardt v. . Loch

92 N.E. 1102, 198 N.Y. 631, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1036
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 1910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*632 Judgment affirmed, without costs. Any relief the plaintiff seeks must be obtained by application in the action brought by these defendants, to which the attorney-general was a party under the statute; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boenhardt v. . Loch, 92 N.E. 1102, 198 N.Y. 631, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1036 (N.Y. 1910).

92 N.E. 1102 (Boenhardt v. . Loch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank v. Tenney
165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 513 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1956)