Boenhardt v. . Loch

92 N.E. 1102, 198 N.Y. 631, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1036
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 31, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 N.E. 1102 (Boenhardt v. . Loch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boenhardt v. . Loch, 92 N.E. 1102, 198 N.Y. 631, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1036 (N.Y. 1910).

Opinion

*632 Judgment affirmed, without costs. Any relief the plaintiff seeks must be obtained by application in the action brought by these defendants, to which the attorney-general was a party under the statute; no opinion.

Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Tenney
165 Ohio St. (N.S.) 513 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.E. 1102, 198 N.Y. 631, 1910 N.Y. LEXIS 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boenhardt-v-loch-ny-1910.