Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United States

254 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 40, 27 C.I.T. 40, 25 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1052, 2003 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedJanuary 7, 2003
DocketSlip Op. 03-4; Court 96-08-02006
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United States, 254 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 40, 27 C.I.T. 40, 25 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1052, 2003 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1 (cit 2003).

Opinion

OPINION

POGUE, Judge.

Plaintiff Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Boen”) challenges the denial of its protest, filed in accordance with section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. § 1514 (1994), against the liquidation of the subject merchandise. 1 *1352 Defendant United States Customs Service (“Defendant” or “Customs”) classified Plaintiffs merchandise under heading 4412 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (1995) (“HTSUS”), as “[plywood, veneered panels, and similar laminated wood.” Plaintiff contends that the subject merchandise should be liquidated under subheading 4409.20.25, HTSUS, as “[n]onconiferous [w]ood flooring.” See Pl.’s Statement of Material Facts Not in Issue at 2 (“Pl.’s Statement of Facts”).

Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1994). This action is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment made by Plaintiff and Defendant pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that the subject merchandise is properly classified under heading 4412.29.50, HTSUS, as a “veneered panel” and grants summary judgment for the defendant.

Undisputed Facts

The subject merchandise consists of hardwood flooring made up of three layers of wood in which the grain of the middle layer is perpendicular to the grain of the two outer layers. See Pl.’s Statement of Facts at 4-5; Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Statement of Material Facts ¶¶ 18-21 (“Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Statement of Facts”). The three layers of the flooring are glued together. See Def.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts ¶ 3; Pl.’s Statement of Facts at 6. Without acknowledging it by explicit agreement, both parties to this action do agree that the subject merchandise has been “laminated.” 2 See Pl.’s Statement of Facts at 6 (stating that the layered stock from which the merchandise is produced is “glu[ed] under pressure”); Def.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts ¶ 3 (stating that the top and bottom layers of the flooring are glued to the middle layer); Def.’s Mem. Supp. Cross Mot. Summ. J. and Opp’n Pl.’s Mot. Summ. J. at 14-15 (“Def.’s Mem.”) (arguing that the merchandise meets the definition of “laminated” and therefore is properly classifiable as “similar laminated wood”), 18 (arguing that the subject merchandise is “highly processed ... by lamination”); see also Dep. of Thomas L. Goss at 29 (stating that a hydraulic press is used to “put[] pressure and heat down on the [flooring layers] to press [them] together and to get the glue to bond”); Boen Marketing Material, Transform, Your World with Boen Hardwood, Collective Ex. A at Specification Suggestions — Materials (stating that “Boen Longstrip shall be laminated construction”); Boen Hardwood Flooring Floating Floor System Installation Guide, Def.’s Ex. 1, (describing the merchandise as “three ply laminate”).

The flooring is continuously shaped with tongue and groove along its edges and ends, see PL’s Statement of Facts at 7; Def.’s Mem. at 2, and comes in a standard size of 5 1/2 inches wide, 7 feet 2 5/8 inches long, and approximately 5/8 inch thick. 3 See PL’s Statement of Facts at 4; Def.’s Resp. to PL’s Statement of Facts f 17. The top layer of the flooring is composed of strips of hardwood measuring approxi *1353 mately 1/8 inch thick and 2 3/4 inches wide. 4 See Pl.’s Statement of Facts at 5; Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Statement of Facts ¶ 21. The center layer consists of spruce slats or strips measuring approximately 5/16 inch thick, 11/16 inch wide, and 5 9/16 inch long. The slats or strips are laid lengthwise with minor but visible spacing between each piece and with their grain running perpendicular to the grain of the wood comprising the top and bottom layers. Order of Nov. 18, 2002. 5 The bottom layer of the flooring is composed of spruce strips, 1/8 inch thick and 2 1/4 to 2 3/4 inches wide. See Pl.’s Statement of Facts at 4; Def.’s Resp. to Pl.’s Statement of Facts ¶ 19. The grain of the bottom layer is perpendicular to the grain of the center layer and parallel to the grain of the top hardwood layer. See Pl.’s Statement of Facts at 5; Def.’s Resp. to PL’s Statement of Facts ¶ 20.

Parties’ Arguments

Plaintiff argues that the imported hardwood flooring in question should be classified within heading 4409, HTSUS, “[w]ood (including strips and friezes for parquet flooring, not assembled) continuously shaped (tongued, grooved, rebated, cham-fered, V-jointed, beaded, molded, rounded or the like) along any of its edges or faces, whether or not planed, sanded or finger-jointed,” and further, under subheading 4409.20.25, HTSUS, “[n]onconiferous [w]ood flooring.” Plaintiff contends that the subject merchandise is properly classifiable under heading 4409, HTSUS, because under prior tariff acts, both wooden flooring and laminated wood, when produced in dimensions found in nature, were classified as lumber products not further manufactured than sawed, planed, tongued, and grooved, rather than as more advanced items. See PL’s Mem. at 14. Plaintiff asserts that the subject merchandise is not classifiable as plywood, veneered panels, or laminated wood because it does not meet the definitions of these items. See PL’s Reply to Def.’s Resp. Opp’n PL’s Mot. Summ. J. and Resp. Opp’n Def.’s Cross Mot. Summ. J. at 4-13 (“PL’s Reply”). Further, Plaintiff argues that even if the subject merchandise were plywood, veneered panels, or similar laminated wood, it would have the essential character of an item of heading 4409, HTSUS, and be classifiable thereunder according to the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System Explanatory Notes (1st ed. 1986) (“Explanatory *1354 Notes”) for heading 4412, HTSUS. See Pl.’s Reply at 13-18.

Defendant asserts that the flooring is properly classified under heading 4412, HTSUS, which describes “[p]lywood, veneered panels and similar laminated wood,” and argues that the flooring meets the definition of plywood. Defendant argues in the alternative that even if the flooring is not plywood it is still classifiable as “veneered panels” or “similar laminated wood.” Def.’s Mem. at 5. Defendant asserts that the flooring is excluded from heading 4409, HTSUS, by the terms of the headings and the Explanatory Notes, id. at 15-17; that cases decided under the TSUS and earlier Tariff Acts are not controlling due to the change in statutory language and legislative intent, id. at 18-20; and that the cases do not support the classification of the subject merchandise under heading 4409, HTSUS. Id. at 21-26.

Standard of Review

Customs’ classification is subject to de novo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Composite Technology International, Inc. v. United States
106 F. Supp. 3d 1337 (Court of International Trade, 2015)
Boen Hardwood Flooring, Inc. v. United States
357 F.3d 1262 (Federal Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 40, 27 C.I.T. 40, 25 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1052, 2003 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boen-hardwood-flooring-inc-v-united-states-cit-2003.