Boelter v. City of Ham Lake
This text of 481 N.W.2d 50 (Boelter v. City of Ham Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari was granted to review a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming the weekly wage determination for a volunteer firefighter.
Gregory Boelter was a journeyman carpenter foreman for a construction company and a volunteer firefighter for the City of Ham Lake. He sustained a back injury while performing his duties as a firefighter; and as a result, he was unable to work as a journeyman carpenter foreman or a volunteer firefighter. He did, however, return to work for the construction company but as a construction estimator, a job that paid him less than one-half his preinjury journeyman carpenter foreman wage. Although benefits were initially computed by use of employee’s pre-injury weekly wage at the construction company, the city later decided it should use the “imputed wage” of a firefighter in Anoka, a wage substantially less than the construction company wage. A compensation judge from the Office of Administrative Hearings determined that the appropriate preinjury wage, for purposes of calculating temporary benefits, was the average weekly wage at employee’s regular employment at the construction company; and the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirmed on appeal. The city contends that Johnson v. City of Plainview, 431 N.W.2d 109 (Minn.1988) requires the use of the imputed wage under Minn.Stat. § 176.011, subd. 3. In Johnson, however, the imputed wage was greater than the regular pre-injury employment wage. Since the object of wage basis is “fairness,” a volunteer firefighter should have the choice of actual wages or imputed wages for purposes of the wage basis computation.
Affirmed.
The employee is awarded $400 in attorney fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
481 N.W.2d 50, 1992 Minn. LEXIS 60, 1992 WL 35303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boelter-v-city-of-ham-lake-minn-1992.