Boelsen v. Boelsen
This text of 259 A.D. 844 (Boelsen v. Boelsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for divorce, in which the defendant counterclaimed for a separation, judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits and granting a separation on the defendant’s counterclaim, and order denying, plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, [845]*845Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and order and to grant a new trial on the ground that the finding of the jury in answer to question ¡No. 1 is against the weight of the credible evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boelsen-v-boelsen-nyappdiv-1940.