Boehringer v. Schmid

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Boehringer v. Schmid

228 A.D. 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D. 881 (Boehringer v. Schmid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boehringer v. Schmid, 228 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question before this court has been determined in favor of the respondents by the opinions of Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J. (in the latter of which Hiscoek and Cardozo, JJ., concur), in Matter of Klaizl (216 N. Y. 83), and by the refusal of the Court of Appeals on February 26, 1924, to allow an appeal to that court in Coleman v. Coleman (207 App. Div. 876). All concur. Present ■ — ■ Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [133 Misc. 236.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question before this court has been determined in favor of the respondents by the opinions of Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J. (in the latter of which Hiscoek and Cardozo, JJ., concur), in Matter of Klaizl (216 N. Y. 83), and by the refusal of the Court of Appeals on February 26, 1924, to allow an appeal to that court in Coleman v. Coleman (207 App. Div. 876). All concur. Present ■ — ■ Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [133 Misc. 236.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boehringer-v-schmid-nyappdiv-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack