Boehringer v. Schmid
228 A.D. 881
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The question before this court has been determined in favor of the respondents by the opinions of Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J. (in the latter of which Hiscoek and Cardozo, JJ., concur), in Matter of Klaizl (216 N. Y. 83), and by the refusal of the Court of Appeals on February 26, 1924, to allow an appeal to that court in Coleman v. Coleman (207 App. Div. 876). All concur. Present ■ — ■ Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [133 Misc. 236.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Boehringer v. Schmid, 228 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 881 (Boehringer v. Schmid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of Klatzl
110 N.E. 181 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Coleman v. Coleman
207 A.D. 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Boehringer v. Schmid
133 Misc. 236 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)