Boehringer v. Boehringer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Boehringer v. Boehringer

856 S.W.2d 694, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102, 1993 WL 265184

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 20, 1993·No. No. 62520·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution action, wife appeals from the trial court’s order denying maintenance and awarding husband’s pension plan to husband with no finding of the present value of the pension.

The motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this dissolution action, wife appeals from the trial court’s order denying maintenance and awarding husband’s pension plan to husband with no finding of the present value of the pension.

The motion court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Boehringer v. Boehringer, 856 S.W.2d 694, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1102, 1993 WL 265184 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

856 S.W.2d 694 (Boehringer v. Boehringer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.