Boehm v. NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PODIATRY EXAMINERS
259 S.E.2d 298, 298 N.C. 294, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1569
This text of 259 S.E.2d 298 (Boehm v. NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PODIATRY EXAMINERS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Boehm v. NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PODIATRY EXAMINERS, 259 S.E.2d 298, 298 N.C. 294, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1569 (N.C. 1979).
Opinion
Dr. Donald P. BOEHM
v.
NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF PODIATRY EXAMINERS.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Farris, Thomas & Farris, for plaintiff.
Broughton, Wilkins, Ross & Crampton, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for writ of certiorari, 41 N.C.App. 567, 255 S.E.2d 328. Denied upon defendant's motion to deny petition for failure to comply with rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Boehm v. North Carolina Board of Podiatry Examiners
255 S.E.2d 328 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 298, 298 N.C. 294, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boehm-v-north-carolina-board-of-podiatry-examiners-nc-1979.