Boehm v. Botsford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Boehm v. Botsford

52 Ark. 400

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedNovember 15, 1889

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 52 Ark. 400 (Boehm v. Botsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boehm v. Botsford, 52 Ark. 400 (Ark. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

tax Sales. All inquiry as to the validity of the plaintiff's tax title was cut off by the decree of confirmation of the tax sale under which their title was acquired. Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark., 118; Buckingham v. Hallett, 24 Ark., 519; McCarter v. Neil, 50 ib., 188.

The court adjudged the defendant’s subsequent tax title invalid upon proof which has not been brought upon the record, and we cannot inquire into the correctness of the finding.

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

tax Sales. All inquiry as to the validity of the plaintiff's tax title was cut off by the decree of confirmation of the tax sale under which their title was acquired. Wallace v. Brown, 22 Ark., 118; Buckingham v. Hallett, 24 Ark., 519; McCarter v. Neil, 50 ib., 188.

The court adjudged the defendant’s subsequent tax title invalid upon proof which has not been brought upon the record, and we cannot inquire into the correctness of the finding.

Affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Ark. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boehm-v-botsford-ark-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack