Boehm v. Boehm

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Boehm v. Boehm

164 So. 3d 1284, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9019, 2015 WL 3645898

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 12, 2015

DocketNo. 2D14-4507

StatusPublished

This text of 164 So. 3d 1284 (Boehm v. Boehm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boehm v. Boehm, 164 So. 3d 1284, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9019, 2015 WL 3645898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

LUCAS, Judge.

Christian Boehm appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Mr. Boehm argues that the trial court improperly calculated his child support obligation by finding that Ms. Boehm had a monthly net income of $1328. Ms. Boehm concedes that the child support guidelines worksheet attached to the final judgment did not accurately reflect her net monthly income. We reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to determine Ms. Boehm’s actual monthly income and recalculate Mr. Boehm’s child support obligation accordingly. We affirm on all other issues raised in this appeal without comment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LUCAS, Judge.

Christian Boehm appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Mr. Boehm argues that the trial court improperly calculated his child support obligation by finding that Ms. Boehm had a monthly net income of $1328. Ms. Boehm concedes that the child support guidelines worksheet attached to the final judgment did not accurately reflect her net monthly income. We reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to determine Ms. Boehm’s actual monthly income and recalculate Mr. Boehm’s child support obligation accordingly. We affirm on all other issues raised in this appeal without comment.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

CASANUEVA and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 So. 3d 1284, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9019, 2015 WL 3645898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boehm-v-boehm-fladistctapp-2015.