Boehm and Shitz v. Engle

Supreme Court

Boehm and Shitz v. Engle

1 U.S. 15, 1 Dall. 15

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided September 1, 1767·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court

were unanimous and clear in their Opinion, that the Act of 32 H. 8 did extend to this Province, and gave it in charge to the Jury accordingly. *

The Verdict of the Jury was conformable to this opinion, by their finding for the Plaintiffs, having made an allowance for the Lives of the two Women in the Damages.

*

See S. P. Morris's versus Vanderen Post. 64. 67.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

were unanimous and clear in their Opinion, that the Act of 32 H. 8 did extend to this Province, and gave it in charge to the Jury accordingly. *

The Verdict of the Jury was conformable to this opinion, by their finding for the Plaintiffs, having made an allowance for the Lives of the two Women in the Damages.

*

See S. P. Morris's versus Vanderen Post. 64. 67.

Boehm and Shitz v. Engle, 1 U.S. 15, 1 Dall. 15 (1767).

Pincite

1 U.S. 15 (Boehm and Shitz v. Engle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related