Boehm and Shitz v. Engle

Supreme Court

Boehm and Shitz v. Engle

1 U.S. 15, 1 Dall. 15

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedSeptember 1, 1767

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 15 (Boehm and Shitz v. Engle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Boehm and Shitz v. Engle, 1 U.S. 15, 1 Dall. 15 (1767).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

were unanimous and clear in their Opinion, that the Act of 32 H. 8 did extend to this Province, and gave it in charge to the Jury accordingly. *

The Verdict of the Jury was conformable to this opinion, by their finding for the Plaintiffs, having made an allowance for the Lives of the two Women in the Damages.

*

See S. P. Morris's versus Vanderen Post. 64. 67.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

were unanimous and clear in their Opinion, that the Act of 32 H. 8 did extend to this Province, and gave it in charge to the Jury accordingly. *

The Verdict of the Jury was conformable to this opinion, by their finding for the Plaintiffs, having made an allowance for the Lives of the two Women in the Damages.

*

See S. P. Morris's versus Vanderen Post. 64. 67.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 U.S. 15, 1 Dall. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boehm-and-shitz-v-engle-scotus-1767.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack