Boehl v. Hecker

1 White & W. 418
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 17, 1880
DocketNo. 791, Op. Book No. 2, p. 269
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 418 (Boehl v. Hecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boehl v. Hecker, 1 White & W. 418 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 761. Appeal bond from justice's court; signatures by marks sufficient. This cause originated in justice’s court, and, upon appeal to the county court, the appeal was dismissed, because the appeal bond did not appear to be signed by the obligors, but was executed by them by making their marks thereto, without any subscribing witness to the fact of their executing the bond. Held, we know of no law which requires that attesting witnesses are essential to give validity to signatures to such instruments where the parties are unable to write. In this instance the bond is prima facie all that the law requires, and is approved by the justice of the peace before whom the case was tried, from the judgment of whom the appeal is prosecuted. The county court erred in dismissing the appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boehl-v-hecker-texapp-1880.