Boedeker v. State

218 S.W.2d 1003, 153 Tex. Crim. 174, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1112
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 23, 1949
DocketNo. 24315
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 S.W.2d 1003 (Boedeker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Boedeker v. State, 218 S.W.2d 1003, 153 Tex. Crim. 174, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1112 (Tex. 1949).

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is rape. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The only question presented for review is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction.

The prosecutrix, a girl eleven years of age, made a complete case against appellant by her testimony. The only point on which appellant contradicted her testimony was penetration. She testified that he did penetrate her private parts with his male organ which he denied. There is evidence from other witnesses relating to other matters which is not necessary to here state since it has no direct bearing on what took place at the time of the commission of the offense. We deem the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction.

[175]*175The court, in his charge, clearly and distinctly instructed the jury relative to the law applicable to the case.

No reversible error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. State
473 S.W.2d 37 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 S.W.2d 1003, 153 Tex. Crim. 174, 1949 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/boedeker-v-state-texcrimapp-1949.