Bodziner v. Greenfield
This text of 133 S.E.2d 338 (Bodziner v. Greenfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where as in the case sub judice the right of the plaintiff to injunctive relief depends upon the decision of an issue of fact and the evidence as to the issue and every phase thereof is disputed and in conflict, the trial judge does not err in granting a temporary injunction pending the final trial of the case. Jones v. Johnson, 60 Ga. 260; Tift v. Farmers Bank of Tifton, 210 Ga. 35 (77 SE2d 505); Waddell v. Goldin, 211 Ga. 820 (89 SE2d 170).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 S.E.2d 338, 219 Ga. 310, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodziner-v-greenfield-ga-1963.