Bodney v. Bodney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bodney v. Bodney

246 So. 2d 578, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6799

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1971·No. No. 70-914·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, former husband of appellee, appeals an amended final judgment of divorce in which the court approved and adopted a stipulation made in open court relating to alimony and homestead property. It is urged that the record does not affirmatively show that appellant agreed to the stipulation. We think this position is without merit in view of appellant’s presence in court, his apparent understanding of this agreement and the agreement of his counsel on his behalf. See Peters v. Spielvogel, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 59; Dunscombe v. Smith, 139 Fla. 497, 190 So. 796 (1939).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, former husband of appellee, appeals an amended final judgment of divorce in which the court approved and adopted a stipulation made in open court relating to alimony and homestead property. It is urged that the record does not affirmatively show that appellant agreed to the stipulation. We think this position is without merit in view of appellant’s presence in court, his apparent understanding of this agreement and the agreement of his counsel on his behalf. See Peters v. Spielvogel, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 59; Dunscombe v. Smith, 139 Fla. 497, 190 So. 796 (1939).

Affirmed.

Bodney v. Bodney, 246 So. 2d 578, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6799 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

246 So. 2d 578 (Bodney v. Bodney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related