Bodnar v. Florence Pipe Foundry & MacHine Co.
This text of 59 A.2d 247 (Bodnar v. Florence Pipe Foundry & MacHine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are asked to reverse the judgment under appeal on the ground that there was no competent evidence to support the *206 finding of fact in the Supreme Court. Our examination of the record convinces us that there is such evidence. It is the settled rule that where there is evidence to support a finding of fact of the Supreme Court, this court is bound thereby.
The judgment is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Bodine, Donges; Hehee, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Feeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 A.2d 247, 137 N.J.L. 205, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodnar-v-florence-pipe-foundry-machine-co-nj-1948.