Bodnar v. Florence Pipe Foundry & MacHine Co.

59 A.2d 247, 137 N.J.L. 205, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 307
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 13, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are asked to reverse the judgment under appeal on the ground that there was no competent evidence to support the *206 finding of fact in the Supreme Court. Our examination of the record convinces us that there is such evidence. It is the settled rule that where there is evidence to support a finding of fact of the Supreme Court, this court is bound thereby.

The judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Bodine, Donges; Hehee, Colie, Wacheneeld, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Feeund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bodnar v. Florence Pipe Foundry & MacHine Co., 59 A.2d 247, 137 N.J.L. 205, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 307 (N.J. 1948).

59 A.2d 247 (Bodnar v. Florence Pipe Foundry & MacHine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Close v. Kordulak Bros.
210 A.2d 753 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
Moore v. Allcast Non-Ferrous Foundry, Inc.
179 A.2d 138 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)