Bodley v. Norton
This text of 5 Ky. 292 (Bodley v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION of the Court, by
Thin |s a writ oí error to a judgment in a scire facían upon a recognizance of special bail. The error assigned is, that there was no capias ad satisfaciendum taken against the principal, before the issuing of the scire facias. This would have been a good plea in the court below, but is not an admissible objection in this court ; for the proceeding» in the original action do not compose apart of the record in the scire facias, unless they had been made so by oyer or otherwise ; and that which is, not apparent upon the face of the record, is not assignable for error — See Russell vs. Hart, Pr. Dec. 365, and the authorities there cited. — -Judgment affirmed, ike.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Ky. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodley-v-norton-kyctapp-1811.