Bodley v. Hord

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Bodley v. Hord

9 Ky. 244, 2 A.K. Marsh. 244, 1820 Ky. LEXIS 33

DecidedApril 25, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ky. 244 (Bodley v. Hord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodley v. Hord, 9 Ky. 244, 2 A.K. Marsh. 244, 1820 Ky. LEXIS 33 (Ky. Ct. App. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the case of Allen against Robinson, 3 Bibb, 326, and of the correctness of which we still entertain no doubt, the circuit court correctly decided, that the deed of the register to Hord, purporting to have been made for the sale of land for taxes, implies, prima facie, a compliance with the requisitions of the laws under which the law was sold, and the deed executed.

The judgment must be affirmed with cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

According to the case of Allen against Robinson, 3 Bibb, 326, and of the correctness of which we still entertain no doubt, the circuit court correctly decided, that the deed of the register to Hord, purporting to have been made for the sale of land for taxes, implies, prima facie, a compliance with the requisitions of the laws under which the law was sold, and the deed executed.

The judgment must be affirmed with cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Ky. 244, 2 A.K. Marsh. 244, 1820 Ky. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodley-v-hord-kyctapp-1820.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack