Bodkin v. Sweeney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bodkin v. Sweeney

805 So. 2d 847, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11266, 2001 WL 898534

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 10, 2001

DocketNos. 2D00-2443, 2D00-2754

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 805 So. 2d 847 (Bodkin v. Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bodkin v. Sweeney, 805 So. 2d 847, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11266, 2001 WL 898534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Acting Chief Judge.

Denley Bodkin disputes the circuit court’s nonfinal orders awarding the former husband temporary custody of the parties’ children (case no. 2D00-2443) and granting his motion to establish child support (case no. 2D00-2754).

We lack jurisdiction to review the nonfi-nal order regarding temporary custody because the appeal was untimely. Ms. Bodkin filed her appeal more than thirty days after the nonfinal order was rendered. A motion for rehearing of a nonfinal order does not suspend the date of rendition of such an order. Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Bond, 696 So.2d 949 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in case number 2D00-2443.

Ms. Bodkin has not provided a record to support her argument that the circuit court erred in its award of child support in case number 2D00-2754. Without an adequate record of the proceedings below, she cannot demonstrate reversible error. See [848]*848Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). In this circumstance, the appellate court is compelled to affirm.

GREEN, J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY (Senior) Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI