Bodkin v. State
708 So. 2d 1047, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5036, 1998 WL 219764
This text of 708 So. 2d 1047 (Bodkin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bodkin v. State, 708 So. 2d 1047, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5036, 1998 WL 219764 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
Affirmed. With regard to Appellant’s claim that his sentence is illegal, see Davis v. State, 661 So.2d 1193, 1197 (Fla.1995), and Novaton v. State, 634 So.2d 607 (Fla.1994). As to all other claims, Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief was untimely filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Davis v. State
661 So. 2d 1193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Novaton v. State
634 So. 2d 607 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
708 So. 2d 1047, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5036, 1998 WL 219764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bodkin-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.